[Oopic-compiler-devel] Re: Asking the community... WAS: Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Testing...
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
ndurant
From: Andrew P. <wa...@ic...> - 2004-04-30 03:15:32
|
At 03:29 AM 4/30/2004 +0100, Neil Durant wrote: >Agreed. Let's put some work into a really well thought out feature list >and present it only when we're pretty sure we can implement these things >(ie after seeing the op-code definitions and some subsequent pondering). >Then we can "go public" with our plans and it won't look like >vapourware/dreamware. Yes, we need to take a long, hard look at the .oex files that are uploaded to the OOPic. This will tell us what sort of useful stuff we can do. For example, I'm pretty sure that the start of the file has an object list definition that is used to build the actual objects in RAM. Once the real objects are in RAM, the list in the EEPROM is ignored. How easy would it be to have a new object list copied there and then trigger a reset of the processor - instant change of available objects. Just don't try to access an object that doesn't exist any more. Obviously, you'd need to branch to the appropriate object initialization routine right after the reset, etc. I need a solid breakdown of everything that can be done in a .oex file to come up with more goodies. ...Andy |