Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK compiler--preliminary

[Andrew P. <wa...@ic...>]

At 09:42 PM 4/29/2004 -0400, D. Daniel McGlothin wrote:
>> >> I wonder if the codes are identical across all target hardware types.
>> >
>> >It seems so. The differences in hardware seem to be additional
>> >byte-codes/firmware capability as the OOpic revision 'increases'.
>>
>> So it's easy then.  Is it done yet?  :)
>
>
>I sheepishly grin and and then blurt "but I'm working on the landscaping and
>garden just now."
>
>
>BTW,  what form should this information be submitted?  Sourceforge DOCS,
>e-mail attaches, or what?
>
>Daniel

No, I mean so the _whole_ compiler project is easy then.  :)

(so is it done yet?)


As far as forms go, I'm a simple ASCII .txt kinda guy, but .doc's,
spreadsheets, .html's, whatever are OK with me.

Email attachments are convenient, since they just show up by themselves
without any extra effort on my part.  Since this is such a small team, I
think we can start off rather informally and just email stuff back and
forth for now.


...Andy