Re: [ooc-compiler] Dead or just comatose?
Brought to you by:
mva
|
From: Michael v. A. <mic...@gm...> - 2010-07-28 16:22:00
|
On 28 July 2010 17:29, Stewart Greenhill <sgr...@ii...> wrote: > [...] > These days I'm mostly using Java though I have recently been looking into > Python and Scala - don't have time to learn every new thing. I still have > some semi-active code using OOC. I occasionally use C for embedded > programming - still the most efficient for small machines. Interesting that you mention Scala. I was considering to take a look at this language as well. But then I decided that one JVM based language like Clojure is more than enough for me. So Odersky's 750+ pages Scala book never found its way onto my bookshelf. Erlang is also tremendously interesting, but it's unlikely that I will encounter a problem in the near future where I can put its strengths to good use. It sure does provide a very different view on programming, and especially on how one can do reliable and/or distributed systems. When I started using Python years ago, I thought that it had a lot of appeal for an Oberon programmer like myself. I like how it evolved over time, the Python guys are a bunch of very bright folks. -- mva |