Re: [ooc-compiler] VisualOberon or not VisualOberon?

[Marco O. <Mar...@we...>]

Am Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2004 18:10 schrieb Frank Hrebabetzky:
> I am starting to use oo2c on Win32/MinGW.
>
> Why not POW? Because IMHO oo2c is (i) more portable, because it (ii)
> offers more functionality (libraries) and it (iii) is easier to use in a
> multilingual project (use of library and program source code written in C).
>
> I certainly will need GUIs, so should I use VisualOberon or another
> framework (Glade/Gtk, Qt, ...)?
>
> I know the Oberon look-and-feel from System 3 and I like it. And using
> the language Oberon for the GUI would make programming more comfortable
> using VisualOberon. On the other hand: VO (i) would have to be
> statically linked to my programs or be installed on the target
> platforms, whereas Gtk already might be there. (ii) More people are
> familiar with C and Gtk. And finally: (iii) for Gtk an interface builder
> is available (Glade). So I tend towards the latter solution.

It takes a some time to learn how to use VisualOberon. The
userinterfaces generated with VisualOberon are different from those
of the Oberon System. I think there are only a few minor points in
the interface, that may cause dissatisfaction.

>
> I am curious about your ideas out there, and especially about the
> objective opinion of Tim ;-)
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Frank Hrebabetzky		Tel.:  +55/48/239-2258
> Photonita Ltda			Fax:   +55/48/239-2200
> Parque Tec. Alfa - Ed. CELTA
> Florianopolis, SC
> 88030-000
> Brasil
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> ooc-compiler mailing list
> ooc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ooc-compiler