Re: [ojAlgo-user] new to sf

[Anders P. <ap...@op...>]

Nick Wexler wrote:
> "What do you think about the fact that PhysicalStore extends both
> MatrixStore and BasicArray?"
>
> Unless the PhysicalStore contract states a different implementation of 
> a BasicArray than what BasicArray states, it should not extend 
> BasicArray.  When necessary, I would let the appropriate classes 
> implement BasicArray instead of gaining those methods through 
> implementing PhysicalStore. 
>
> During this change, I think documenting the Contract differences 
> between a MatrixStore and a PhysicalStore would be extremely helping 
> in determining the proper usage of the interfaces.

I think my original idea was something like:

BasicArray is arbitrary-dimensional, and PhysicalStore is two-dimesnional.

MatrixStore is basic and immutable, PhysicalStore is more feature rich 
and mutable.


Currently I really feel I should disconnect PhysicalStore from 
BasicArray, but the required code changes are a bit messy. I need a good 
day to do it.

/Anders