Re: [ojAlgo-user] Question/Issue

[Anders P. <an...@op...>]

The intention is that BigFunction, ComplexFunction and  
PrimitiveFunction should have matching sets of members and that  
implementations should be specific to their type.

Currently BigFunction implementations have taken a shortcut. Fixing  
this, generally, is not high priority.

Is there something in particular causing you problems?

Also; in the future most (all) BigFunction, ComplexFunction and  
PrimitiveFunction members should be org.ojalgo.function.Function  
instances.

/Anders

On 31 maj 2006, at 20.01, David H. Clements wrote:

> First of all, great library, I really appreciate the work that has  
> been put
> into this.
>
> A question:
>
> In the BigFunction package everything returns BigDecimals, but it is
> converted as an intermediary step into a double, which loses the  
> fidelity of
> using a BigDecimal to start with.  Are there any plans to rewrite  
> these so
> that they maintain BigDecimal fidelity?
>
> Sincerely,
> David H. Clements
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and  
> Risk!
> Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat  
> certifications in
> the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> ojAlgo-user mailing list
> ojA...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ojalgo-user