Re: [Ogdl-core] Binary OGDL spec

[Patrick D. <pa...@wa...>]

Two comments on this:

  - It might be nice to support "random access" of the file.  This could 
be implemented by including more size information.  For example, each 
node could contain an offset to the the next sibling and the next child.

  - What is the reason for distinguishing between text-node and 
binary-node?  Is it to save space by not including length data?

Rolf Veen wrote:
> Hi, all.
> 
> I've uploaded a new spec of a binary version of
> OGDL, and an associated 'Remote functions' spec.
> 
> The binary format is intended to be exchanged
> between machines, as it allows to intermix normal
> text nodes with images, etc.
> 
> The RF spec defines a way to expose functions as
> remote services, by making the call and the response
> be OGDL binary objects.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rolf.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log 
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Ogdl-core mailing list
> Ogd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ogdl-core