From: Dmitri A. S. <das...@gm...> - 2005-04-24 03:36:47
|
Since we are on subject of copyright. I was looking for files in octave-forge with missing clear copyright statement. There are quite a few of those. Here some of them: main/vrml/ most files (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) (some files do not have even author name) main/general/ deref.cc (?) main/control/ feedback.m (Ben Sapp <bs...@la...>) main/image/ imginfo.m (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) imread.m (Andy Adler) imwrite.m (Andy Adler) testimio.m main/irsa/ irsa_actcore.m ( Joerg Huber ?) main/linear-algebra/ GramSchmidt.cc (P.R. Nienhuis <106...@co...>?) main/optim/ cdiff.m (?) wsolve.m (Paul Kienzle ?) main/signal/ flattopwin.m (Paul Kienzle ?) freqs_plot.m (Paul Kienzle ?) ellipdemo.m (Paul Kienzle ?) main/symbolic/ probably_prime.cc (?) main/specfun/ expint.f (D.E. AMOS) Why do we need this file there at all? main/struct/ struct.cc (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) main/time/ datesplit.m (Bill Denney <bi...@gi...>) extra/ver20 most files (Paul Kienzle) I think something has to be done about it. Sincerely, Dmitri. -- |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2005-04-24 16:34:00
|
On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:36 PM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote: > Since we are on subject of copyright. > > I was looking for files in octave-forge > with missing clear copyright statement. > There are quite a few of those. You can use 'cvs log' to find out who is responsible for entering individual files in the repository. > Here some of them: > > main/vrml/ > most files (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) > (some files do not have even author name) > > main/general/ > deref.cc (?) Paul Kienzle (this will be purged after the next release) > main/control/ > feedback.m (Ben Sapp <bs...@la...>) > > main/image/ > imginfo.m (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) > > imread.m (Andy Adler) > > imwrite.m (Andy Adler) > > testimio.m Paul Kienzle > main/irsa/ > irsa_actcore.m ( Joerg Huber ?) already has a copyright statement > main/linear-algebra/ > GramSchmidt.cc (P.R. Nienhuis <106...@co...>?) > > main/optim/ > cdiff.m (?) Etienne Grossmann > wsolve.m (Paul Kienzle ?) Paul Kienzle > main/signal/ > flattopwin.m (Paul Kienzle ?) Paul Kienzle > freqs_plot.m (Paul Kienzle ?) Julius Smith > ellipdemo.m (Paul Kienzle ?) Paulo Neis > main/symbolic/ > probably_prime.cc (?) Paul Kienzle > > main/specfun/ > expint.f (D.E. AMOS) > Why do we need this file there at all? removed. > > main/struct/ > struct.cc (Etienne Grossmann <et...@is...>) > > main/time/ > datesplit.m (Bill Denney <bi...@gi...>) > > extra/ver20 > most files (Paul Kienzle) FSF does not insist on copyright statements short files. > I think something has to be done about it. Strictly speaking the copyright defaults to BSD according to the top level COPYING file. This probably isn't possible to do, and certainly not so simply as I have done it. admin/get_authors will list the uncopyrighted files. Unfortunately it doesn't properly filter out all public domain files or short programs. Anyone care to fix it? In trying to figure out what exact text I should use to disclaim copyright I found this advice on a Python mailing list: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051531.html Here's what the Creative Commons uses as their public domain disclosure: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ Thanks, - Paul |
From: Russell S. <r.s...@un...> - 2005-04-25 00:00:56
|
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:40:43AM -0400, Bill Denney wrote: >=20 > Sorry about that. I agree to license this and all my contributions to=20 > octave and octave forge as GPL'd code. (This should prevent problems if = I=20 > unexpectedly pass away as was previously mentioned.) >=20 I think I missed that previous "mention". What were the problems? Surely code openly released by the copyright holder without an explicit license becomes "public domain" and can be used in any way by whomever as they see fit. --=20 *PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you may safely ignore this attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 8308 3119 (mobile) Mathematics 0425 253119 (") UNSW SYDNEY 2052 R.S...@un... =20 Australia http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Dmitri A. S. <das...@gm...> - 2005-04-25 01:16:12
|
Russell Standish wrote: ... > Surely code openly released by the copyright holder without an > explicit license becomes "public domain" and can be used in any way by > whomever as they see fit. > This is, generally speaking, definitely not the case in USA (see e.g.: http://creativecommons.org/about/legal/cultivating). As Paul Kienzle pointed out to me, in case of octave-forge, indeed any non-claimed work become BSD-licensed or public domain. From the file COPYING: <<< ... Any files not otherwise covered by a license are assumed to be covered by a BSD-style license (see COPYING.BSD) if the author is listed or in the public domain if no author is listed. Files which link with octave are implicitly covered by the GPL (see COPYING.GPL). >>> Sincerely, Dmitri. -- |
From: Andy A. <ad...@si...> - 2005-04-25 01:09:30
|
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote: > I was looking for files in octave-forge > with missing clear copyright statement. > > main/image/ > imread.m (Andy Adler) > imwrite.m (Andy Adler) Fixed. Thanks for doing this work. -- Andy Adler |