On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:28:56 +0200
Stefan van der Walt <st...@su...> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:12:40AM -0600, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> > atstr = sprintf("%f,%f", position(1),position(2));
> >
> > str = sprintf("%f", 1e-9)
> > results in ... 0!
> >
> > The following patch seems to work for me:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > --- text.m.orig 2004-12-03 10:08:10.000000000 +0100
> > +++ text.m 2004-12-03 10:08:42.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -147,9 +147,9 @@
> > font = "";
> > endif
> > if position(3)!=0,
> > - atstr = sprintf("%f,%f,%f", position(1),position(2),position(3));
> > + atstr = sprintf("%e,%e,%e", position(1),position(2),position(3));
> > else
> > - atstr = sprintf("%f,%f", position(1),position(2));
> > + atstr = sprintf("%e,%e", position(1),position(2));
> > endif
> > command = sprintf('gset label "%s" at %s %s %s %s%s',
> > str, units, atstr, align, rotate, font);
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you do that, bigger numbers will also be printed in engineering
> notation. I.e.
>
> octave:22> sprintf("%e\n", 1024)
> ans = 1.024000e+03
May we use sprintf("%g\n", 1024) ?
--
Dr. Laurent Mazet: Research Engineer /V\ Centre de Recherche de MOTOROLA
Tel: +33 (0)1 69 35 48 30 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Email: ma...@cr...
|
