Thread: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

A collection of packages providing extra functionality for GNU Octave

Brought to you by: adb014, ajanke, avinoamk, carandraug, and 13 others

octave-dev

[OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 09:02:06

Hi everyone

I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot
of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0.

I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems.

Thanks,
Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 10:43:19

On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi everyone
> 
> I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot
> of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0.
> 
> I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems.
> 
> Thanks,
> Carnë
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got visibility?
> Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
> Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Oct...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Hi Carnë

I'll give it a try. Is there an option to download a tarball from the new repository [1]? The old repository [2] has the link "Download GNU tarball" at the bottom of the page. It was very convenient. Links without revision numbers (11177 in [1]) wouldn't be bad either.

Best regards,
Lukas


[1]
http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11177/tree/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/

[2]
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 11:24:14

On 1 October 2012 12:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot
>> of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0.
>>
>> I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carnë
>>
>
> Hi Carnë
>
> I'll give it a try. Is there an option to download a tarball from the new repository [1]? The old repository [2] has the link "Download GNU tarball" at the bottom of the page. It was very convenient. Links without revision numbers (11177 in [1]) wouldn't be bad either.
>
> Best regards,
> Lukas
>
>
> [1]
> http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11177/tree/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/
>
> [2]
> http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/

Upps. I uploaded the file to my server but forgot to give the link.
Please download it from

http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.90.tar.gz

As far as I know there's no way to download a tarball directly from
the new repository but I haven't had much time to try the new
SourceForge. There's a bunch of other things I don't like such as
being much slower, not being able to order by last modification,
really hard to change revision, incorrectly identifying text as binary
files...

Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 13:43:45

On 01.10.2012, at 13:23, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:

> On 1 October 2012 12:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone
>>> 
>>> I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot
>>> of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0.
>>> 
>>> I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Carnë
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi Carnë
>> 
>> I'll give it a try. Is there an option to download a tarball from the new repository [1]? The old repository [2] has the link "Download GNU tarball" at the bottom of the page. It was very convenient. Links without revision numbers (11177 in [1]) wouldn't be bad either.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Lukas
>> 
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11177/tree/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/
>> 
>> [2]
>> http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/
> 
> Upps. I uploaded the file to my server but forgot to give the link.
> Please download it from
> 
> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.90.tar.gz
> 
> As far as I know there's no way to download a tarball directly from
> the new repository but I haven't had much time to try the new
> SourceForge. There's a bunch of other things I don't like such as
> being much slower, not being able to order by last modification,
> really hard to change revision, incorrectly identifying text as binary
> files...
> 
> Carnë


Hi Carnë

There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang from Apple's Xcode 4.5 on OS X 10.8.2.

Best regards,
Lukas


octave:5> pkg install image*
In file included from __spatial_filtering__.cc:20:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from __bilateral__.cc:16:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from __custom_gaussian_smoothing__.cc:16:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from __boundary__.cc:21:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from bwlabel.cc:16:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from bwfill.cc:5:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from rotate_scale.cc:11:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from hough_line.cc:24:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from graycomatrix.cc:24:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from deriche.cc:6:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from __bwdist.cc:19:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from nonmax_supress.cc:16:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
In file included from bwlabeln.cc:19:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
#include <unordered_map>
         ^
1 warning and 1 error generated.
make: *** [bwlabeln.oct] Error 1
'make' returned the following error: mkoctfile -Wall __spatial_filtering__.cc
mkoctfile -Wall __bilateral__.cc
mkoctfile -Wall __custom_gaussian_smoothing__.cc
mkoctfile -Wall __boundary__.cc
mkoctfile -Wall bwlabel.cc
mkoctfile -Wall bwfill.cc
mkoctfile -Wall rotate_scale.cc
mkoctfile -Wall hough_line.cc
mkoctfile -Wall graycomatrix.cc
mkoctfile -Wall deriche.cc
mkoctfile -Wall __bwdist.cc
mkoctfile -Wall nonmax_supress.cc
CXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -std=c++0x -Wall' mkoctfile bwlabeln.cc
error: called from `pkg>configure_make' in file /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m near line 1385, column 9
error: called from:
error:   /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 827, column 5
error:   /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 383, column 9
octave:5>

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Alexander H. <ale...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 14:38:36

On 10/1/12 6:43 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> 
> On 01.10.2012, at 13:23, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
> 
>> On 1 October 2012 12:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>>> On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>
>>>> I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot
>>>> of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Carnë
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Carnë
>>>
>>> I'll give it a try. Is there an option to download a tarball from the new repository [1]? The old repository [2] has the link "Download GNU tarball" at the bottom of the page. It was very convenient. Links without revision numbers (11177 in [1]) wouldn't be bad either.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Lukas
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11177/tree/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/image/
>>
>> Upps. I uploaded the file to my server but forgot to give the link.
>> Please download it from
>>
>> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.90.tar.gz
>>
>> As far as I know there's no way to download a tarball directly from
>> the new repository but I haven't had much time to try the new
>> SourceForge. There's a bunch of other things I don't like such as
>> being much slower, not being able to order by last modification,
>> really hard to change revision, incorrectly identifying text as binary
>> files...
>>
>> Carnë
> 
> 
> Hi Carnë
> 
> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang from Apple's Xcode 4.5 on OS X 10.8.2.
> 
> Best regards,
> Lukas
> 
> 
> octave:5> pkg install image*
> In file included from __spatial_filtering__.cc:20:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from __bilateral__.cc:16:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from __custom_gaussian_smoothing__.cc:16:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from __boundary__.cc:21:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from bwlabel.cc:16:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from bwfill.cc:5:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from rotate_scale.cc:11:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from hough_line.cc:24:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from graycomatrix.cc:24:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from deriche.cc:6:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from __bwdist.cc:19:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from nonmax_supress.cc:16:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/../octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> In file included from bwlabeln.cc:19:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
> #include <unordered_map>
>          ^
> 1 warning and 1 error generated.
> make: *** [bwlabeln.oct] Error 1
> 'make' returned the following error: mkoctfile -Wall __spatial_filtering__.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall __bilateral__.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall __custom_gaussian_smoothing__.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall __boundary__.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall bwlabel.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall bwfill.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall rotate_scale.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall hough_line.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall graycomatrix.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall deriche.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall __bwdist.cc
> mkoctfile -Wall nonmax_supress.cc
> CXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -std=c++0x -Wall' mkoctfile bwlabeln.cc
> error: called from `pkg>configure_make' in file /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m near line 1385, column 9
> error: called from:
> error:   /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 827, column 5
> error:   /sw/share/octave/3.6.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 383, column 9
> octave:5> 
> 
> 

You might try tweaking your mkoctfile symlinks to have mkoctfile point
to /sw/bin/mkoctfile-gcc4.7 .  If you then do your "pkg install" again
the C compilers from Fink's "gcc47-compiler" package will be used
instead of those from Xcode, and unordered_map is indeed included with
gcc47-compiler.

I created this alternative mkoctfile to use in building packages where
Xcode compilers didn't happen to provide libraries/headers that were needed.
-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 21:07:38

On 1 October 2012 15:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang from Apple's Xcode 4.5 on OS X 10.8.2.

Thank you very much. I'll see if I can fix this things.

Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Jordi G. H. <jo...@oc...> - 2012-10-01 13:46:15

On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang
[snip]
> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
> #include <unordered_map>

This should be available on a modern enough system. I wish clang
wasn't so laggy with respect to C++ support. What clang version is
that?

- Jordi G. H.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Jordi G. H. <jo...@oc...> - 2012-10-01 13:51:07

On 1 October 2012 09:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:
> On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang
> [snip]
>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
>> #include <unordered_map>
>
> This should be available on a modern enough system. I wish clang
> wasn't so laggy with respect to C++ support. What clang version is
> that?

Is this the relevant clang bug?

    http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12544

- Jordi G. H.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 14:02:11

On 01.10.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:

> On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang
> [snip]
>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
>> #include <unordered_map>
> 
> This should be available on a modern enough system. I wish clang
> wasn't so laggy with respect to C++ support. What clang version is
> that?
> 
> - Jordi G. H.


Are you looking for this?

ra:~ lukas$ clang -v
Apple clang version 4.1 (tags/Apple/clang-421.11.65) (based on LLVM 3.1svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
Thread model: posix
ra:~ lukas$ 

Lukas

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Jordi G. H. <jo...@oc...> - 2012-10-01 14:06:57

On 1 October 2012 10:01, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>
> On 01.10.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:
>
>> On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>>> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang
>> [snip]
>>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
>>> #include <unordered_map>
>>
>> This should be available on a modern enough system. I wish clang
>> wasn't so laggy with respect to C++ support. What clang version is
>> that?
>
> Are you looking for this?
>
> ra:~ lukas$ clang -v
> Apple clang version 4.1 (tags/Apple/clang-421.11.65) (based on LLVM 3.1svn)
> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0

Looks like they only fixed this bug in March. I don't know if this is
already in 3.1. I am not particularly happy about the idea of patching
my code for the benefit of non-GNU users. However, I would welcome a
patch to work around that clang bug, if you care to write it.

- Jordi G. H.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 14:22:28

On 01.10.2012, at 16:06, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:

> On 1 October 2012 10:01, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>> 
>> On 01.10.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is clang
>>> [snip]
>>>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
>>>> #include <unordered_map>
>>> 
>>> This should be available on a modern enough system. I wish clang
>>> wasn't so laggy with respect to C++ support. What clang version is
>>> that?
>> 
>> Are you looking for this?
>> 
>> ra:~ lukas$ clang -v
>> Apple clang version 4.1 (tags/Apple/clang-421.11.65) (based on LLVM 3.1svn)
>> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
> 
> Looks like they only fixed this bug in March. I don't know if this is
> already in 3.1. I am not particularly happy about the idea of patching
> my code for the benefit of non-GNU users. However, I would welcome a
> patch to work around that clang bug, if you care to write it.
> 
> - Jordi G. H.

Well, I have no idea how to fix this. If you don't work around it, I'll have to wait until Apple updates clang/llvm again. This would be no tragedy, as I am rarely using the image package. In fact I tested the new version to do Carnë a favour and out of curiosity whether it works on other platforms than GNU/Linux + GCC.

Best regards,
Lukas

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Kris T. <kri...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 14:18:54

> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso 
> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:07
> On 1 October 2012 10:01, Lukas Reichlin  
> wrote:
> >>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
> >>> #include <unordered_map>
> >
> > ra:~ lukas$ clang -v
> > Apple clang version 4.1 (tags/Apple/clang-421.11.65) (based on LLVM
> 3.1svn)
> > Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
> 
> Looks like they only fixed this bug in March. I don't know if this is
> already in 3.1. I am not particularly happy about the idea of patching
> my code for the benefit of non-GNU users. However, I would welcome a
> patch to work around that clang bug, if you care to write it.
> 
> 
Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At least the user can then install boost.

Kris

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Jordi G. H. <jo...@oc...> - 2012-10-01 14:27:40

On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:07
>> On 1 October 2012 10:01, Lukas Reichlin
>> wrote:
>> >>> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered_map' file not found
>> >>> #include <unordered_map>
>> >
>> > ra:~ lukas$ clang -v
>> > Apple clang version 4.1 (tags/Apple/clang-421.11.65) (based on LLVM
>> 3.1svn)
>> > Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
>>
>> Looks like they only fixed this bug in March. I don't know if this is
>> already in 3.1. I am not particularly happy about the idea of patching
>> my code for the benefit of non-GNU users. However, I would welcome a
>> patch to work around that clang bug, if you care to write it.
>>
>>
> Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At least the user can then install boost.

Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
script now... Or would you do it?

- Jordi G. H.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Kris T. <kri...@gm...> - 2012-10-01 15:35:04

From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
> 
> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At least the
> user can then install boost.
> 
> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
> script now... Or would you do it?

You got me there :-;

Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-1.6
which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting point...

I was more thinking to use an ugly work-around: something like 
#ifdef CLANG 
#include <boost/unordered_map.hpp> 
namespace std { using boost::unordered_map; }
#endif

Autoconf wildly preferable of course.

Kris

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-06 18:18:16

On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>>
>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At least the
>> user can then install boost.
>>
>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>> script now... Or would you do it?
>
>
> You got me there :-;
>
> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-1.6
> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting point...

Hi Kris

I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?

About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.

Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-11 23:05:38

On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
> On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>>>
>>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>>> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At least the
>>> user can then install boost.
>>>
>>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>>> script now... Or would you do it?
>>
>>
>> You got me there :-;
>>
>> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
>> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-1.6
>> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting point...
>
> Hi Kris
>
> I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
> to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
>
> About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
> already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
>
> Carnë

Hi Kris

are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
this weekend if not.

Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Kris T. <kri...@gm...> - 2012-10-12 07:53:55

> On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> >>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
> >>>
> >>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
> >>> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At
least
> the
> >>> user can then install boost.
> >>>
> >>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
> >>> script now... Or would you do it?
> >>
> >>
> >> You got me there :-;
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
> >>
> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-
> 1.6
> >> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting
> point...
> >
> > Hi Kris
> >
> > I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
> > to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
> >
> > About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
> > already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
> >
> > Carnë
> 
> Hi Kris
> 
> are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
> this weekend if not.
> 
> Carnë

Hi Carnë

Apologies but I don't have the time for this at least until December,
especially as it'd take me a lot of effort to learn enough about autoconf to
get it to work. 

All the best 
Kris

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-24 23:25:17

On 12 October 2012 09:53, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>> > On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>> >>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>> >>>
>> >>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>> >>> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At
> least
>> the
>> >>> user can then install boost.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>> >>> script now... Or would you do it?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You got me there :-;
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
>> >>
>> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-
>> 1.6
>> >> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting
>> point...
>> >
>> > Hi Kris
>> >
>> > I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
>> > to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
>> >
>> > About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
>> > already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
>> >
>> > Carnë
>>
>> Hi Kris
>>
>> are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
>> this weekend if not.
>>
>> Carnë
>
> Hi Carnë
>
> Apologies but I don't have the time for this at least until December,
> especially as it'd take me a lot of effort to learn enough about autoconf to
> get it to work.
>
> All the best
> Kris

Hi

thanks to Jordi for fixing this problem. It should install fine now
with other compilers. Could you please give it a go, see if it
installs and if there's any other problems?

The new dev version is at http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.93.tar.gz

Thanks in advance,
Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-26 18:02:23

On 25 October 2012 01:24, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 09:53, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>>> On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>> >>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>>> >>> > Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At
>> least
>>> the
>>> >>> user can then install boost.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>>> >>> script now... Or would you do it?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> You got me there :-;
>>> >>
>>> >> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
>>> >>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-
>>> 1.6
>>> >> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting
>>> point...
>>> >
>>> > Hi Kris
>>> >
>>> > I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
>>> > to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
>>> >
>>> > About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
>>> > already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
>>> >
>>> > Carnë
>>>
>>> Hi Kris
>>>
>>> are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
>>> this weekend if not.
>>>
>>> Carnë
>>
>> Hi Carnë
>>
>> Apologies but I don't have the time for this at least until December,
>> especially as it'd take me a lot of effort to learn enough about autoconf to
>> get it to work.
>>
>> All the best
>> Kris
>
> Hi
>
> thanks to Jordi for fixing this problem. It should install fine now
> with other compilers. Could you please give it a go, see if it
> installs and if there's any other problems?
>
> The new dev version is at http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.93.tar.gz

A new release candidate http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz

This time should really really install with clang. Please let me know
of any problems.

Thanks in advance,
Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-26 18:16:24

On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:

> On 25 October 2012 01:24, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 12 October 2012 09:53, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>>>>>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At
>>> least
>>>> the
>>>>>>> user can then install boost.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>>>>>>> script now... Or would you do it?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You got me there :-;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
>>>>>> 
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-
>>>> 1.6
>>>>>> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting
>>>> point...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Kris
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
>>>>> to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
>>>>> 
>>>>> About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
>>>>> already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Carnë
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Kris
>>>> 
>>>> are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
>>>> this weekend if not.
>>>> 
>>>> Carnë
>>> 
>>> Hi Carnë
>>> 
>>> Apologies but I don't have the time for this at least until December,
>>> especially as it'd take me a lot of effort to learn enough about autoconf to
>>> get it to work.
>>> 
>>> All the best
>>> Kris
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> thanks to Jordi for fixing this problem. It should install fine now
>> with other compilers. Could you please give it a go, see if it
>> installs and if there's any other problems?
>> 
>> The new dev version is at http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.93.tar.gz
> 
> A new release candidate http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
> 
> This time should really really install with clang. Please let me know
> of any problems.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Carnë

Is your system up and running? I'm unable to connect.

Lukas

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-26 18:32:28

On 26 October 2012 20:16, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> On 25 October 2012 01:24, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>>> On 12 October 2012 09:53, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>> On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans <kri...@gm...>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>>>>>>> Sent: 01 October 2012 15:27
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1 October 2012 10:18, Kris Thielemans < > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Why not use fall back to boost unordered_map for (old) clang? At
>>>> least
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> user can then install boost.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, this is fine too. I suppose I'll have to write an autoconf
>>>>>>>> script now... Or would you do it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You got me there :-;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, my knowledge of autoconf is close to zero. I did find
>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/carve/source/browse/configure.ac?name=rev-
>>>>> 1.6
>>>>>>> which is from a GPL project. Maybe somebody can use this as starting
>>>>> point...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Kris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also don't know autoconf to fix this. Are you able to submit a patch
>>>>>> to fix this? Or able to convince someone to fix it for you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About all the other warnings they are all in Octave core and have
>>>>>> already been fixed in dev. There's nothing I can do about them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carnë
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Kris
>>>>>
>>>>> are you planning on fixing this? I'll be releasing the new version
>>>>> this weekend if not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carnë
>>>>
>>>> Hi Carnë
>>>>
>>>> Apologies but I don't have the time for this at least until December,
>>>> especially as it'd take me a lot of effort to learn enough about autoconf to
>>>> get it to work.
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>> Kris
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> thanks to Jordi for fixing this problem. It should install fine now
>>> with other compilers. Could you please give it a go, see if it
>>> installs and if there's any other problems?
>>>
>>> The new dev version is at http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.93.tar.gz
>>
>> A new release candidate http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
>>
>> This time should really really install with clang. Please let me know
>> of any problems.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Carnë
>
> Is your system up and running? I'm unable to connect.

Yes it is. I asked some people on IRC and they also can access it. Can
you try again?

Thanks
Carnë

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Jordi G. H. <jo...@oc...> - 2012-10-26 18:37:21

On 26 October 2012 14:16, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:

>> A new release candidate
>> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
>>
>> This time should really really install with clang. Please let me
>> know of any problems.
>
> Is your system up and running? I'm unable to connect.

Try this:

    http://jordi.platinum.linux.pl/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz

- Jordi G. H.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Lukas R. <luk...@gm...> - 2012-10-26 19:14:38

On 26.10.2012, at 20:37, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:

> On 26 October 2012 14:16, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
> 
>>> A new release candidate
>>> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> This time should really really install with clang. Please let me
>>> know of any problems.
>> 
>> Is your system up and running? I'm unable to connect.
> 
> Try this:
> 
>    http://jordi.platinum.linux.pl/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
> 
> - Jordi G. H.


Your link worked:

octave:1> pkg install image*
In file included from bwlabeln.cc:20:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
      class [-Wmismatched-tags]
  struct opts
  ^
/sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
  class opts;
  ^~~~~
  struct
1 warning generated.
For information about changes from previous versions of the image package, run 'news ("image")'.
octave:2> 

Regards,
Lukas

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

From: Carnë D. <car...@gm...> - 2012-10-27 17:32:38

On 26 October 2012 20:14, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
> On 26.10.2012, at 20:37, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jo...@oc...> wrote:
>
>> On 26 October 2012 14:16, Lukas Reichlin <luk...@gm...> wrote:
>>> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>>>> A new release candidate
>>>> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> This time should really really install with clang. Please let me
>>>> know of any problems.
>>>
>>> Is your system up and running? I'm unable to connect.
>>
>> Try this:
>>
>>    http://jordi.platinum.linux.pl/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz
>>
>> - Jordi G. H.
>
>
> Your link worked:
>
> octave:1> pkg install image*
> In file included from bwlabeln.cc:20:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/oct.h:36:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-dld.h:30:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/defun-int.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-builtin.h:28:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/ov-fcn.h:35:
> In file included from /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/symtab.h:34:
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:90:3: warning: 'opts' defined as a struct here but previously declared as a
>       class [-Wmismatched-tags]
>   struct opts
>   ^
> /sw/include/octave-3.6.3/octave/regexp.h:40:3: note: did you mean struct here?
>   class opts;
>   ^~~~~
>   struct
> 1 warning generated.
> For information about changes from previous versions of the image package, run 'news ("image")'.
> octave:2>
>
> Regards,
> Lukas

Thanks for testing Lukas. Good to see it working. That warning comes
from Octave core, there's nothing I can do about it and should already
been fixed in dev.

If no one reports any problem with this. I'll make the release tomorrow.

Carnë