This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(2) |
2003 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(39) |
Dec
(57) |
2004 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(93) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(4) |
2005 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(77) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(66) |
2006 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(79) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(25) |
2007 |
Jan
(120) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(145) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(160) |
2008 |
Jan
(163) |
Feb
(212) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(157) |
May
(216) |
Jun
(120) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(129) |
2009 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(80) |
Mar
(174) |
Apr
(142) |
May
(133) |
Jun
(191) |
Jul
(183) |
Aug
(138) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(141) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(131) |
2010 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(213) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(222) |
May
(168) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(144) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(80) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(78) |
2011 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(98) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(150) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(154) |
Nov
(321) |
Dec
(183) |
2012 |
Jan
(146) |
Feb
(217) |
Mar
(426) |
Apr
(208) |
May
(206) |
Jun
(230) |
Jul
(158) |
Aug
(170) |
Sep
(237) |
Oct
(260) |
Nov
(178) |
Dec
|
From: Miquel C. <miq...@ua...> - 2006-03-17 15:56:43
|
(shame on me for not completing my self-imposed home work, it's a lame excuse, but if it help to indulge on me... these are rather hectic times) On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 09:02 -0600, Joshua Rigler wrote: > Maybe this has already been suggested/tried, but what about using some > sort of free/open source CAPTCHA program? late January I contacted the author of the wiki server used by Octave wiki about this issue. See below my message and his reply. Briefly, his advice is against that sort of access control. Indeed, after doing some research on the subject, I found that it's a bullet vs shield head to head race, and that there's freely available code that defaces the simpler ones, while the difficult ones are difficult too for humans. He proposed instead, 1. blacklisting URL 2. smart questions asker extension, already available for his wiki server. The asker distinguishes human from bots by posing a random question chosen from a list. See the oddmuse link below for an example. Miquel -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Miquel Cabanas <Miq...@ua...> > Reply-To: Miq...@ua... > To: al...@em... > Subject: catpcha perl implementation for oddmuse? > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:37:31 +0100 > hi Alex, > > several months ago, the Octave wiki page [1] was defaced by a spam bot > [2]. This led the wiki administrators to lock the wiki site, which > turned to be a good idea to prevent attacks but also discouraged users > from contributing to the website [3]. > > I was about to post a message to the Octave list proposing to replace > the current IP-based access control protocol with a CATPCHA based > system, but I have just seen that catpcha is not yet implemented in > Oddmuse, although it is being considered. > > According to the Wikipedia, there are already two Perl packages > implementing catpcha [4]. Do you think they could be used in Oddmuse? > How difficult would be to include them in Oddmuse? > > [1] http://wiki.octave.org/ > [2] http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/~etienne/wiki.pl-defaced-edited.html > [3] http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?WikiDiscussion > [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha#Perl > > I look forward to hear your opinion before sending the message to the > Octave community. -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Alex Schroeder <al...@gn...> > To: Miq...@ua... > Subject: Re: catpcha perl implementation for oddmuse? > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:44:49 +0100 > Personally, we've switched to blacklisting URLs. That doesn't work > for you? Personally I dislike tests based on images because that > locks out the blind and users of text browsers. There's also the > question asker extension which works with text only. I like that > one... > > http://www.oddmuse.org/cgi-bin/oddmuse-en/QuestionAsker_Extension > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Miquel Cabanas <miq...@ua...> > Reply-To: miq...@ua... > To: Alex Schroeder <al...@gn...> > Subject: Re: catpcha perl implementation for oddmuse? > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:14:54 +0100 > thanks for your reply. In the meanwhile, I've become more familiar with > the pros and cons of the captcha approach, and have realised that the > simple ones are also easy to deface while the hard ones can't be hard to > solve also for humans. And yes, eye impaired people or those using text > browsers are left out. > |
From: Joshua R. <jr...@ha...> - 2006-03-17 14:57:36
|
Maybe this has already been suggested/tried, but what about using some sort of free/open source CAPTCHA program? If you aren't sure what that is, or if you want a good list of available implementations in Perl, PHP, Java, etc., as well as several online services, go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAPTCHA Sorry, I've never actually implemented any of these, but I suspect it can't be too hard if one has at least rudimentary web-authoring skills (famous last words). -EJR Paul Kienzle wrote: > How about the following? > > Assuming the spam is coming from 'bots rather than humans, > you could post the password on the wiki itself. Individual > humans who still spam can be handled with a blackhole list. > Persistent humans with 'bot nets would still be a problem, but there > should be few enough of these that we can automatically turf > edits which contain their spam string. If the problem still > persists, post new passwords to he...@oc... periodically. > > - Paul > > On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Etienne Grossmann wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> who wants a password to edit the wiki? This offer is for non-spammers >> only! If you qualify, send me your password and I'll add it to the >> list of passwords. This should at last loosen a little bit the >> conditions for editors. >> >> You or anyone else can then use your pwd from anywhere. For our >> security, please [1] <<"log out" if you are "logged in" from a public >> terminal, by using the password action and not providing a password.>> >> Logging in/out, aka "using the password action," would be done by >> going to http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?action=password. >> >> Is everyone ok w/ this? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Etienne > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. > > Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org > How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html > Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html > ------------------------------------------------------------- > |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2006-03-17 03:53:18
|
How about the following? Assuming the spam is coming from 'bots rather than humans, you could post the password on the wiki itself. Individual humans who still spam can be handled with a blackhole list. Persistent humans with 'bot nets would still be a problem, but there should be few enough of these that we can automatically turf edits which contain their spam string. If the problem still persists, post new passwords to he...@oc... periodically. - Paul On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Etienne Grossmann wrote: > > Hi All, > > who wants a password to edit the wiki? This offer is for non-spammers > only! If you qualify, send me your password and I'll add it to the > list of passwords. This should at last loosen a little bit the > conditions for editors. > > You or anyone else can then use your pwd from anywhere. For our > security, please [1] <<"log out" if you are "logged in" from a public > terminal, by using the password action and not providing a password.>> > Logging in/out, aka "using the password action," would be done by > going to http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?action=password. > > Is everyone ok w/ this? > > Cheers, > > Etienne |
From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2006-03-17 03:00:23
|
Hi All, who wants a password to edit the wiki? This offer is for non-spammers only! If you qualify, send me your password and I'll add it to the list of passwords. This should at last loosen a little bit the conditions for editors. You or anyone else can then use your pwd from anywhere. For our security, please [1] <<"log out" if you are "logged in" from a public terminal, by using the password action and not providing a password.>> Logging in/out, aka "using the password action," would be done by going to http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?action=password. Is everyone ok w/ this? Cheers, Etienne On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:42:11PM -0500, Bill Denney wrote: # You mentioned in the previous e-mail that you didn't know how to set # passwords on oddmuse. Here is the info. # # Bill # # -- # "hee hee, i have a pony." -- Amy Feingold # # # ---------- Forwarded message ---------- # Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:43:10 -0500 (EST) # From: Bill Denney <de...@se...> # To: et...@cs..., et...@is..., # eti...@la... # Cc: to...@ku..., mai...@oc... # Subject: Re: Website Updates # # According to http://www.oddmuse.org/cgi-bin/wiki/Passwords, you can add a # variable to the config file called $EditPass with a space separated list of # passwords: # # $EditPass # # Default: empty # # This is a string containing a list of passwords separated by whitespace. # Thus, 'foo bar' defines two passwords, 'foo' and 'bar'. Any user having set # one of these passwords is considered to be an editor for the wiki. # # Bill # # On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Etienne Grossmann wrote: # # > # > Hi All, # > # >we can try to set the wiki w/ a password, if oddmuse (the wiki prog) # >allows. If someone knows exactly what should be done, send me # >braindead instructions and I can give it a try. Since I am traveling # >until the 21st, I can only spend a wee bit of time at a time on this # >question; else I can look into it after the 21st. Else you can send me # >your IP and I can add it to the wiki so you can edit. # > # > Cheers, thx for proposing to contribute & sorry for the hurdle # > before allowing you to edit the wiki... # > # > Etienne # > [snip] -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |
From: John W. E. <jw...@be...> - 2006-03-16 03:47:16
|
On 1-Jan-2006, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote: | I've done the following: | 1. Changed the help text of the strcmp function to reflect its ability | to accept cell arrays as arguments. | 2. Simplified the strcmpi and strncmp functions. | 3. Imported strncmpi from octave-forge and simplified it. | 4. Written the strtrunc function. | | Explanation: | 1. strcmp is actually already compatible with Matlab's strcmp, so I | just added the help text. | 2. The implementations of strcmpi, strncmp, and strncmpi | (octave-forge) are too complex, IMO, so I simplified them. | 3. But the changes made to strncmp and strncmpi needs strtrunc, so I wrote it. | 4. strtrunc takes a string or cellstr as its first argument (s), then | truncates it to the value of the second argument (n). | | Although strtrunc is not present in Matlab, I think this is useful, so | I'm sending it here. I hope John would accept this. | | The attachments: | 1. str2.diff.txt: diff for strcmp, strcmpi, strncmp | 2. str2.ChangeLog.src.txt: changelog entry for strcmp | 3. str2.ChangeLog.scripts.txt: changelog entry for strcmpi, strncmp, | strncmpi and strtrunc | 4. strncmpi.m.txt, strtrunc.m.txt: the corresponding functions I applied these changes. Thanks, jwe |
From: Quentin S. <qsp...@ie...> - 2006-03-15 20:17:11
|
A while ago I reported an incompatibility with Matlab in the order of outputs of the "system" function. John made changes in CVS recently to fix this. I have prepared the necessary changes for octave-forge (about 10 files are affected). Should I check these changes in now, or wait until 2.9.5 is released? This will break compatibility with 2.1.x--have we already crossed that point? -Quentin |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-10 23:27:43
|
On 1/18/06, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno <wil...@gm...> wrote= : > OK, when I get home, because I don't have my computer with me right now..= . > Oops.... I completely forgot about this... :( Here's the file attached. -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2006-03-10 01:37:11
|
It is best if you can find an independent explanation of the algorithm which you can cite in the documentation. It makes the documentation better, and it makes the argument that it is an independent explanation easier to support. E.g., http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section2/pri245.htm - Paul On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:41 AM, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote: > On 3/9/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: >> >> Yet again I had to loosen the criteria on the tests in order to pass >> the tests on OS X PPC architecture. >> >> The dataset is known to be hard, so I'm not surprised by the weak >> tolerances. I'm curious if e.g., R can compute better results. >> > > Well, OK, so can we say regress.m is quite finished by now? And maybe > I can start on rcoplot. I didn't study the code on the rcoplot manual, > so is it legal for me to write that function anyway? (without > referring to the code). > > -- > William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno > |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-09 11:41:12
|
On 3/9/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: > > Yet again I had to loosen the criteria on the tests in order to pass > the tests on OS X PPC architecture. > > The dataset is known to be hard, so I'm not surprised by the weak > tolerances. I'm curious if e.g., R can compute better results. > Well, OK, so can we say regress.m is quite finished by now? And maybe I can start on rcoplot. I didn't study the code on the rcoplot manual, so is it legal for me to write that function anyway? (without referring to the code). -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2006-03-09 09:41:27
|
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:49 AM, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote: > On 3/8/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: >> >> I generally use only one digit for the tolerance. >> > > OK, then use 1 digit :) The standard error values differ by as much as > 10e-3 (as can be seen from the assert), and it doesn't improve if I > embed the test in the main part of the script (that is, just using > sqrt(v*c) as the standard error values). Yet again I had to loosen the criteria on the tests in order to pass the tests on OS X PPC architecture. The dataset is known to be hard, so I'm not surprised by the weak tolerances. I'm curious if e.g., R can compute better results. - Paul |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-09 06:49:49
|
On 3/8/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: > > I generally use only one digit for the tolerance. > OK, then use 1 digit :) The standard error values differ by as much as 10e-3 (as can be seen from the assert), and it doesn't improve if I embed the test in the main part of the script (that is, just using sqrt(v*c) as the standard error values). > Because I tinv and fcdf were not available in my version of Octave. > These can change once we abandon support for 2.1.x > > OK, looking forward to it :) -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-09 06:46:55
|
Temporarily (?) dropping John from the list. I think he's a bit busy right now (?). On 3/8/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: > I'm not keen to add octave patches to octave-forge because they will > just need to be removed later. > > strncmp and strncmpi rely on strtrunc which I do not have. > > strcmpi is doable, but I haven't yet checked how it differs from > strcmpi.m.in and octave's strcmpi.m. > > - Paul > Sorry, strtrunc is my invention (matlab doesn't have it), and I forgot to upload it along with the other attachments in the last mail... It's attached now, please take a look :) -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2006-03-08 13:09:34
|
I'm not keen to add octave patches to octave-forge because they will just need to be removed later. strncmp and strncmpi rely on strtrunc which I do not have. strcmpi is doable, but I haven't yet checked how it differs from strcmpi.m.in and octave's strcmpi.m. - Paul On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:11 AM, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote: > Hi all, since my submission to bu...@oc... hasn't been accepted > yet, would octave-forge accept these files? Please comment, anyway :) > > -- > William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno > <strcmpi.m><strncmp.m><strncmpi.m> |
From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2006-03-08 12:37:06
|
On Mar 7, 2006, at 8:51 PM, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote: > On 2/21/06, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno <wil...@gm...> > wrote: >> On 2/20/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, I added a test of the Longley data set from the NIST >>> Statistical >>> Reference Database. >>> >>> The performance is pretty bad (norm of answer-certified value is >>> about >>> 10^-7), but that's a bit better than the competition. >>> >>> Someone with more R experience than me will have to see if it >>> performs >>> any better. >>> >>> Also, if you can convert bint to standard error values that would be >>> convenient. >>> >>> - Paul >>> >>> ---- >>> >>> % Longley data from the NIST Statistical Reference Dataset >>> Z = [ 60323 83.0 234289 2356 1590 107608 1947 >>> 61122 88.5 259426 2325 1456 108632 1948 >>> 60171 88.2 258054 3682 1616 109773 1949 >>> 61187 89.5 284599 3351 1650 110929 1950 >>> 63221 96.2 328975 2099 3099 112075 1951 >>> 63639 98.1 346999 1932 3594 113270 1952 >>> 64989 99.0 365385 1870 3547 115094 1953 >>> 63761 100.0 363112 3578 3350 116219 1954 >>> 66019 101.2 397469 2904 3048 117388 1955 >>> 67857 104.6 419180 2822 2857 118734 1956 >>> 68169 108.4 442769 2936 2798 120445 1957 >>> 66513 110.8 444546 4681 2637 121950 1958 >>> 68655 112.6 482704 3813 2552 123366 1959 >>> 69564 114.2 502601 3931 2514 125368 1960 >>> 69331 115.7 518173 4806 2572 127852 1961 >>> 70551 116.9 554894 4007 2827 130081 1962 ]; >>> % Results certified by NIST using 100 digit arithmetic >>> % b and standard error in b >>> V = [ -3482258.63459582 890420.383607373 >>> 15.0618722713733 84.9149257747669 >>> -0.358191792925910E-01 0.334910077722432E-01 >>> -2.02022980381683 0.488399681651699 >>> -1.03322686717359 0.214274163161675 >>> -0.511041056535807E-01 0.226073200069370 >>> 1829.15146461355 455.478499142212 ]; >>> Rsq = 0.995479004577296; >>> F = 330.285339234588; >>> y = Z(:,1); X = [ones(rows(Z),1), Z(:,2:end)]; >>> [b, bint, r, rint, stats] = regress (y, X, 0.05); >>> assert(b, V(:,1), 6e-7) >>> assert(stats(1), Rsq, 7e-14) >>> assert(stats(2), F, 5e-9) >>> >>> >> >> Yes, you can convert bint to the standard error values with (0.05 is >> alpha, 9 is the degree of freedom): >> ((bint(:, 1) - bint(:, 2)) / 2) / tinv (0.05 / 2, 9) >> but the accuracy will be affected. (It's not so accurate anyway...) >> > > I still don't know how to improve the accuracy... > I've added an assertion for the standard error values, but I've got to > set the tolerance to 7.6e-3 (that's not good). Also, I think one > decimal point for the tolerance would be good, what do you think? I generally use only one digit for the tolerance. > By the way, in the octave-forge version (in the repository), the > functions tinv and fcdf are replaced by t_inv and f_cdf. Why? Because I tinv and fcdf were not available in my version of Octave. These can change once we abandon support for 2.1.x - Paul |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-08 01:51:37
|
On 2/21/06, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno <wil...@gm...> wrote= : > On 2/20/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote: > > > > Okay, I added a test of the Longley data set from the NIST Statistical > > Reference Database. > > > > The performance is pretty bad (norm of answer-certified value is about > > 10^-7), but that's a bit better than the competition. > > > > Someone with more R experience than me will have to see if it performs > > any better. > > > > Also, if you can convert bint to standard error values that would be > > convenient. > > > > - Paul > > > > ---- > > > > % Longley data from the NIST Statistical Reference Dataset > > Z =3D [ 60323 83.0 234289 2356 1590 107608 1947 > > 61122 88.5 259426 2325 1456 108632 1948 > > 60171 88.2 258054 3682 1616 109773 1949 > > 61187 89.5 284599 3351 1650 110929 1950 > > 63221 96.2 328975 2099 3099 112075 1951 > > 63639 98.1 346999 1932 3594 113270 1952 > > 64989 99.0 365385 1870 3547 115094 1953 > > 63761 100.0 363112 3578 3350 116219 1954 > > 66019 101.2 397469 2904 3048 117388 1955 > > 67857 104.6 419180 2822 2857 118734 1956 > > 68169 108.4 442769 2936 2798 120445 1957 > > 66513 110.8 444546 4681 2637 121950 1958 > > 68655 112.6 482704 3813 2552 123366 1959 > > 69564 114.2 502601 3931 2514 125368 1960 > > 69331 115.7 518173 4806 2572 127852 1961 > > 70551 116.9 554894 4007 2827 130081 1962 ]; > > % Results certified by NIST using 100 digit arithmetic > > % b and standard error in b > > V =3D [ -3482258.63459582 890420.383607373 > > 15.0618722713733 84.9149257747669 > > -0.358191792925910E-01 0.334910077722432E-01 > > -2.02022980381683 0.488399681651699 > > -1.03322686717359 0.214274163161675 > > -0.511041056535807E-01 0.226073200069370 > > 1829.15146461355 455.478499142212 ]; > > Rsq =3D 0.995479004577296; > > F =3D 330.285339234588; > > y =3D Z(:,1); X =3D [ones(rows(Z),1), Z(:,2:end)]; > > [b, bint, r, rint, stats] =3D regress (y, X, 0.05); > > assert(b, V(:,1), 6e-7) > > assert(stats(1), Rsq, 7e-14) > > assert(stats(2), F, 5e-9) > > > > > > Yes, you can convert bint to the standard error values with (0.05 is > alpha, 9 is the degree of freedom): > ((bint(:, 1) - bint(:, 2)) / 2) / tinv (0.05 / 2, 9) > but the accuracy will be affected. (It's not so accurate anyway...) > I still don't know how to improve the accuracy... I've added an assertion for the standard error values, but I've got to set the tolerance to 7.6e-3 (that's not good). Also, I think one decimal point for the tolerance would be good, what do you think? By the way, in the octave-forge version (in the repository), the functions tinv and fcdf are replaced by t_inv and f_cdf. Why? -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: William P. Y. H. <wil...@gm...> - 2006-03-07 08:11:37
|
Hi all, since my submission to bu...@oc... hasn't been accepted yet, would octave-forge accept these files? Please comment, anyway :) -- William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno |
From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2006-02-26 09:21:35
|
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: # Am Samstag, den 25.02.2006, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: # > Iirc, I read swhere that 'nofollow' was what was wanted, but I don't # > know the topic well. Iirc, robots (not browsers) get a FOLLOW.You're # > positive about 'follow'? Can someone point me to swhere where I can # > find out myself? # # http://fr.selfhtml.org/html/entete/meta.htm#robots # # I guess french is okay for you :) Set to index,follow # # > # <body class="http://wiki.octave.org/"> # > # Such a class doesn't exist. As well, the classes 'header' and 'footer' # > # don't exist. # > # > How do I change that? It's set around line 1770 of wiki.pl # # Well, then just leave it like that. If you want to customize the css in # the future, it's still there and doesn't hurt now. I just thought you # had missed something. # Ok # > Also what r feelings for/against scariness in 'ScaryOctave'? # # Honestly? Just drop the 'scary'. We should use one name (Octave). Point taken. # Regards # Thomas -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |
From: Thomas W. <we...@nu...> - 2006-02-25 23:21:22
|
Am Samstag, den 25.02.2006, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: > Iirc, I read swhere that 'nofollow' was what was wanted, but I don't > know the topic well. Iirc, robots (not browsers) get a FOLLOW.You're > positive about 'follow'? Can someone point me to swhere where I can > find out myself? http://fr.selfhtml.org/html/entete/meta.htm#robots I guess french is okay for you :) > # <body class="http://wiki.octave.org/"> > # Such a class doesn't exist. As well, the classes 'header' and 'footer' > # don't exist. > > How do I change that? It's set around line 1770 of wiki.pl Well, then just leave it like that. If you want to customize the css in the future, it's still there and doesn't hurt now. I just thought you had missed something. > Also what r feelings for/against scariness in 'ScaryOctave'? Honestly? Just drop the 'scary'. We should use one name (Octave). Regards Thomas |
From: Stefan v. d. W. <st...@su...> - 2006-02-25 22:12:38
|
The following is an extract from the latest sourceforge.net newsletter: ----- Forwarded message from "SourceForge.net Team" <no...@so...> ----- Subversion General Availability ------------------------------- The SourceForge.net team is pleased to announce the General Availability of Subversion service to SourceForge.net-hosted projects, effective 2006-02-21. This service offering is in addition to our existing CVS service; as with all of our services, projects may select (and enable in the project admin pages) the portion of our offering that best meets their needs. We wish to extend our thanks to the many projects and developers who have helped us to test our Subversion service as part of our six-week beta, which completed last week. Our particular thanks go to these projects, whose members provided substantial feedback regarding the new service: * Inkscape - http://sourceforge.net/projects/inkscape/ * DejaVu Fonts - http://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/ * ScummVM - http://sourceforge.net/projects/scummvm/ * evilnet - http://sourceforge.net/projects/evilnet/ Our Subversion service includes: SSL-based Repository Access: * Developer Subversion access via HTTPS, auth is requested when you perform a write operation * Anonymous Subversion access via HTTPS * No sync delays between developer and anonymous Subversion access * Per-developer access control over repository access (ACL support to be added in the future) via the SourceForge.net permissions system Web-based viewing: * Web-based repository access via ViewVC (formerly known as ViewCVS) On-demand self-service backups and mirroring capability: * Read-only rsync access to the repository to permit backups and remote mirroring Ease of migration: * Automated self-service migration of your SourceForge.net project CVS repository, CVS tarball, or Subversion dump to our Subversion service Well-considered add-ons to basic service: * A selected set of hook scripts, including commit email support and CIA bot support * Statistics tracking of Subversion repository activity Service may be enabled by project administrators in the "Subversion" section of the Project Admin pages. Complete service documentation is available at: http://sf.net/docs/E09/ Documentation is provided for supported clients at: http://sf.net/docs/F06/ for the command-line SVN client http://sf.net/docs/F07/ for TortoiseSVN Our support of Subversion has been based on substantial research and testing in the past few months, which we have pursued specifically based on requests from the community. SourceForge.net continues to consider new technologies and evaluate community requests in further strengthening our service offering. |
From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2006-02-25 20:07:21
|
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:13:47PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: # Hi, # # first the off-topic stuff. Do you *really* want email sent to all these # adresses appearing in your reply-to header? Yes, plz. # Am Samstag, den 25.02.2006, 11:55 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: # > This hint inspired me to do a few + changes in the wiki's # > css... Feedback? # # General feedback: # <meta name="robots" content="INDEX,NOFOLLOW"> # I suggest changing this to "FOLLOW". After all, it's good if web # crawlers index the wiki, isn't it? Iirc, I read swhere that 'nofollow' was what was wanted, but I don't know the topic well. Iirc, robots (not browsers) get a FOLLOW.You're positive about 'follow'? Can someone point me to swhere where I can find out myself? # <body class="http://wiki.octave.org/"> # Such a class doesn't exist. As well, the classes 'header' and 'footer' # don't exist. How do I change that? It's set around line 1770 of wiki.pl my $theme = GetParam('theme',$q->url(-path_info=>1)); $html = qq(<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">\n<html>) . $q->head($q->title($q->escapeHTML($title)) . $html) . '<body class="' . $theme . '">'; return $html; # For the h3 headers, something like "margin-top: 1em;" might make the # site more readable. Done. # While there are some things in the HTML code that I don't like (using a # table just to align the image left), this is probably inevitable in a # wiki system. The latest oddmuse can do it, I just didn't manage 2 do a port yesterday. # However, I suggest to change the content license from GFDL to GPL (or to # dual-license it). Otherwise, it's not (legally) possible to copy & paste # code from the wiki pages into a GPL program. Opinions anyone? Also what r feelings for/against scariness in 'ScaryOctave'? # Regards # Thomas -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |
From: Thomas W. <we...@nu...> - 2006-02-25 18:14:01
|
Hi, first the off-topic stuff. Do you *really* want email sent to all these adresses appearing in your reply-to header? Am Samstag, den 25.02.2006, 11:55 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: > This hint inspired me to do a few + changes in the wiki's > css... Feedback? General feedback: <meta name="robots" content="INDEX,NOFOLLOW"> I suggest changing this to "FOLLOW". After all, it's good if web crawlers index the wiki, isn't it? <body class="http://wiki.octave.org/"> Such a class doesn't exist. As well, the classes 'header' and 'footer' don't exist. For the h3 headers, something like "margin-top: 1em;" might make the site more readable. While there are some things in the HTML code that I don't like (using a table just to align the image left), this is probably inevitable in a wiki system. However, I suggest to change the content license from GFDL to GPL (or to dual-license it). Otherwise, it's not (legally) possible to copy & paste code from the wiki pages into a GPL program. Regards Thomas |
From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2006-02-25 16:55:49
|
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 01:25:50PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: # Am Freitag, den 24.02.2006, 10:08 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: # > * Colors and (non-) font choice are same as in www.octave.org. # > # > Unwanted consequence: the lines of '-' that separate ===headers=== # > appear dashed, not smooth. # > # > Todo: How does one fix that? # # Change 'dashed' to 'solid' in your .css file. Yes! Tanks a lot! This hint inspired me to do a few + changes in the wiki's css... Feedback? Cheers, Etienne # Regards # Thomas # # # # ------------------------------------------------------- # This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language # that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast # and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! # http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 # _______________________________________________ # Octave-dev mailing list # Oct...@li... # https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |
From: Thomas W. <we...@nu...> - 2006-02-25 12:52:40
|
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2006, 10:08 -0500 schrieb Etienne Grossmann: > * Colors and (non-) font choice are same as in www.octave.org. > > Unwanted consequence: the lines of '-' that separate ===headers=== > appear dashed, not smooth. > > Todo: How does one fix that? Change 'dashed' to 'solid' in your .css file. Regards Thomas |
From: Quentin S. <qsp...@ie...> - 2006-02-24 15:38:38
|
Etienne Grossmann wrote: > Hi All, > > I just did a few changes to the wiki.octave.org. Have a look & let me > know if you think it's an improvement or not. Have a look at the "todo" > below and see if you can help. Summary: > > * Colors and (non-) font choice are same as in www.octave.org. > > Unwanted consequence: the lines of '-' that separate ===headers=== > appear dashed, not smooth. > > Todo: How does one fix that? > > * Logo image is Lorenz instead of sombrero. > > * Main page has sombrero in topleft corner, as in www.octave.org. In > order to do this, I cut-n-pasted octave.org's html code and had > to set $RawHtml to 1, which is bad. > > Todo: does anyone know how to get same effect w/out using raw html? > > * At top of main page, I put three sentences of intro & welcome. > > Todo: We could have "ScaryOctave" in the same style as "Octave" in > http://www.octave.org/images/octave-logo.jpg. Can anyone (tell us > how to) do that? > > Looks like someone was playing with special effects in GIMP. I'm not crazy about that particular "logo" myself, and I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to just come up with a new one for both pages. > Btw, where does "Scary" in ScaryOctave come from? > > I seem to remember that it was an imitation of other similar wikis, like I think there's a ScaryEmacs. Personally, I think the whole "Scary" think is kind of silly and I'd be happy to see the title just be "Octave Wiki" or something that more accurately describes what the website is. -Quentin |
From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2006-02-24 15:08:53
|
Hi All, I just did a few changes to the wiki.octave.org. Have a look & let me know if you think it's an improvement or not. Have a look at the "todo" below and see if you can help. Summary: * Colors and (non-) font choice are same as in www.octave.org. Unwanted consequence: the lines of '-' that separate ===headers=== appear dashed, not smooth. Todo: How does one fix that? * Logo image is Lorenz instead of sombrero. * Main page has sombrero in topleft corner, as in www.octave.org. In order to do this, I cut-n-pasted octave.org's html code and had to set $RawHtml to 1, which is bad. Todo: does anyone know how to get same effect w/out using raw html? * At top of main page, I put three sentences of intro & welcome. Todo: We could have "ScaryOctave" in the same style as "Octave" in http://www.octave.org/images/octave-logo.jpg. Can anyone (tell us how to) do that? Btw, where does "Scary" in ScaryOctave come from? Todo: Passwords! I didn't figure out how to set a password on oddmuse. :-( Hth, Etienne -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |