Re: [OctDev] De-crufting octave-forge

[David B. <Dav...@mo...>]

Quentin Spencer wrote:

> David Bateman wrote:
>
>> Quentin Spencer wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Theoretically, the 2006.03.17 o-f release builds with 2.9.5, but there
>>> are incompatibilities, as recently pointed out with the system
>>> function (should be fixed in CVS now), so I think we should make
>>> another release for 2.9.5+ soon. I'm willing to spend a little time
>>> doing some de-crufting, but I just wanted to ask first if there is
>>> anything I shouldn't touch. The obvious stuff is all of the Makefiles
>>> and .m.in files for things that are now in octave, but even that is
>>> incomplete (most of the stuff in the main/time directory appears to be
>>> in octave now, and there are probably more examples). I also was
>>> inclined to just remove the whole sparse directory, but I thought
>>> David said we needed to keep the superLU stuff. Any objections?
>>>
>>> -Quentin
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> A lot of stuff is conditionally built, and that can be removed. Also for
>> the sparse stuff the iteration stuff should be kept for 2.9, but not the
>> rest. That is the pcg.m and pcr.m functions, but nothing else.
>>
>
> I have now cleaned out everything in main/sparse except for these two
> files.
>
> -Quentin
>
>
With all of the patches that John accepted you can completely remove the
FIXES directory...

D.


-- 
David Bateman                                Dav...@mo...
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary