Re: [OctDev] regress and rcoplot (partially written, please help)

[Paul K. <pki...@us...>]

It is best if you can find an independent explanation of the algorithm 
which you can cite in the documentation.  It makes the documentation 
better, and it makes the argument that it is an independent explanation 
easier to support.  E.g.,

	http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section2/pri245.htm


- Paul

On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:41 AM, William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno wrote:

> On 3/9/06, Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> wrote:
>>
>> Yet again I had to loosen the criteria on the tests in order to pass
>> the tests on OS X PPC architecture.
>>
>> The dataset is known to be hard, so I'm not surprised by the weak
>> tolerances.  I'm curious if e.g., R can compute better results.
>>
>
> Well, OK, so can we say regress.m is quite finished by now? And maybe
> I can start on rcoplot. I didn't study the code on the rcoplot manual,
> so is it legal for me to write that function anyway? (without
> referring to the code).
>
> --
> William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno
>