Re: [OctDev] Re: [Octave-cvsupdate] octave-forge/main/image imread.m,1.11,1.12 imwrite.m,1.8,1.9

[Stefan v. d. W. <st...@su...>]

On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:32:03AM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
>=20
> Rather than peppering our code with #ifdef, I would suggest supporting=20
> the
> latest API only and writing a translation layer to the older APIs.  Let
> configure sort out whether the translation is included.  Maybe somebody
> has already done so and gave it to the libMagick community?  Or are the
> API's so incompatible that this won't work?

Maybe the higher-level libMagick++ doesn't suffer from these
problems.  I'll take a look.

Regards
St=E9fan