Re: [OctDev] pcre.h not found

[Paul K. <pki...@us...>]

On May 30, 2005, at 12:03 AM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:

> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>> I'll apply this patch, but I'm not too thrilled about relying on the
>> existence of pcre-config.  Do we need a fallback which will search
>> for pcre.h and libpcre if pcre-config is not present?
>> Thanks,
>>     - Paul
>
> It looks to me that it is rather safe to assume that pcre.h is in
> standard include directory -- after some googling it looks to me
> that many other packages depend on it
> (number of reports in redhat's bugzilla also confirm that).

So we don't need to rely on the existence of pcre-config, and I
shouldn't apply the patch?

- Paul