Re: [OctDev] pcre.h not found

[Stefan v. d. W. <st...@su...>]

How about the following patch, as well as renaming pcregexp.cc to
pcregexp.cc.in and doing a variable substitution:

#include <@PCRE_H@>

If you think this will do the job I can apply the patch.

It's a pity we arn't use subversion: svn move instead of delete (lose
history), rename, commit.

Regards
Stefan

Index: configure.add
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
RCS file: /cvsroot/octave/octave-forge/main/strings/configure.add,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 configure.add
--- configure.add       1 Mar 2005 16:33:33 -0000       1.2
+++ configure.add       13 Apr 2005 12:57:00 -0000
@@ -5,7 +5,13 @@
 else

     AC_SUBST(HAVE_PCRE)
-    AC_CHECK_HEADER(pcre.h, HAVE_PCRE=3Dyes, HAVE_PCRE=3Dno)
+    AC_SUBST(PCRE_H)
+
+    AC_CHECK_HEADER(pcre.h, [HAVE_PCRE=3Dyes;PCRE_H=3Dpcre.h], HAVE_PCRE=
=3Dno)
+    if test $HAVE_PCRE =3D no ; then
+        AC_CHECK_HEADER(pcre/pcre.h, [HAVE_PCRE=3Dyes;PCRE_H=3Dpcre/pcre.h=
], HAVE_PCRE=3Dno)
+    fi
+
     if test $HAVE_PCRE =3D yes ; then
        OF_CHECK_LIB(pcre, pcre_compile, HAVE_PCRE=3Dyes, HAVE_PCRE=3Dno)
        if test $HAVE_PCRE =3D no ; then
@@ -16,7 +22,8 @@
     else
        STATUS=3D"pcre.h not found"
     fi
-
+
+    AC_OUTPUT(main/strings/pcregexp.cc)
 fi

 STATUS_MSG=3D"$STATUS_MSG


On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:35:14AM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> The spelling error is in:
>=20
> 	main/strings/configure.add
>=20
> I don't know what the proper solution to pcre/pcre.h
> is off hand.
>=20
> - Paul
>=20
> On Apr 13, 2005, at 3:09 AM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
>=20
> >using 2005.04.12 cvs snapshot.
> >
> >./configure reports
> >
> >...
> >
> >Perl compatible regular expresions: pcre.h not found
> >                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^(sic!)
> >
> >pcre.h is in /usr/include/pcre/pcre.h
> >
> >Configure apparently checks for <pcre.h> (and not for <pcre/pcre.h>) .
> >I do not know what is really broken here, and what is the
> >proper way of fixing it. (I also cannot figure out
> >where did "expresions" is coming from, may be this is an autoconf
> >typo.)
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >Dmitri.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Oct...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev