Re: [OctDev] random numbers for distributed computations

[Michael C. <mic...@ua...>]

Hi David,
I have a question about this. If a RNG has a period of X, that means that  
there are X unique values that are generated, and then the sequence repeats. 
But is the set of X values unique, so that the same X values will be 
generated eventually, regardless of the seed, just in a different order? Or 
do the X values themselves depend on the seed?


That is, suppose a RNG has period 3. When we get a seed from /dev/urandom, if 
a first sequence is
1 2 3 1 2 3

Will another seed give something like

2 3 4 2 3 4 

or

2 3 1 2 3 1

?

On Monday 11 April 2005 11:14, David Bateman wrote:
> Michael Creel wrote:
> >Hello,
> >I'm planning on implementing some method to ensure that random number
> > streams generated on different nodes of a cluster are independent of one
> > another. This is important for problems such as Monte Carlo. Before I
> > start, I'd like to hear advice, suggestions, requests. Thanks, Michael
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> >_______________________________________________
> >Octave-dev mailing list
> >Oct...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
>
> If your platform as /dev/urandom, then the octave-forge random
> generators will use it to seed the generators, and you will end up with
> independent number streams. Even if you don't have /dev/urandom, then
> these generators use the LSB of the clock to seed with (ie. usec) and so
> you'll probably find yourself with independent streams in any case.
>
> So my advice is to use the octave-forge generators...
>
> D.