Re: [OctDev] Help making padarray.m quicker

[Paul K. <pki...@us...>]

On Aug 10, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Josep Mon=E9s i Teixidor wrote:

> I've left padding with scalar values as it was in the second version
> because, although in my intel box that was slower, as Paul sent
> yesterday, that probably makes a real difference on MacOs X.

Note the difference in version number: 2.1.55 for OS X,
2.1.57 for linux!  Octave may have changed to make the
two more similar.  Does somebody have both versions
available on the same system that they can compare?

- Paul