From: Josep i T. <jm...@pu...> - 2004-08-10 00:17:06
|
On dl, 2004-08-09 at 14:15, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > On 08/08/04 20:50, Josep Mon=E9s i Teixidor wrote: > > Let's introduce padarray... >=20 > Hi Josep, >=20 > padarray.m seems to replicate and extend the functionality in impad.m, wh= ich > is already in octave-forge. Since padarray is more Matlab compatible, we > should probably start using it instead. >=20 > "rgrep -l impad *" gives: >=20 > image/fftconv2.m > image/impad.m > image/imrotate.m > image/imshear.m > image/imtranslate.m > image/medfilt2.m > image/ordfilt2.m >=20 > Would you be interested in changing the function calls to impad in these > functions to padarray, so that impad can be deprecated? >=20 > Teemu Ok. I'm following a suggestion from Paul Kienze to speed up padarray, since it uses cat extensively which is much more slower than allocating an array and assigning everything after that. So padarray will change soon... After that I can change those calls if everyone agrees... If someone can test if it's compatible with matlab counterpart please do so (and all the others too) since I don't have it to test it (I've coded them using their online docs). --=20 Josep Mon=E9s i Teixidor Clau GnuPG: gpg --recv-keys 80E85CC4 |