Re: [OctDev] new release?

[Paul K. <pki...@us...>]

Will it cause problems for you if the build succeeds even
when it fails?  That is, if I put in the -k business so that
people can ignore things that don't build on their architecture
unless they really need them, it won't generate an exit
status on Debian builds.

On second thought, I can put in a make parameter such as:
	make STOP=1
Use this if you want to build and stop at the first error.  If
nobody disagrees, that's what I will do.  I'll skip the nice
report of what doesn't build for now.

Paul Kienzle
pki...@us...

On Jul 3, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:51:21PM +0200, David Bateman wrote:
>> Dapr?s Rafael Laboissiere <ra...@de...> (le 21/06/2004):
>>> Should we impose a freeze on the involved packages until they get all
>>> together into testing?
>>
>> Yes, please... :-)
>
> It looks like things moved according to plan and octave2.1 and 
> octave-forge
> are now in testing.
>
> So shall we release a new octave-forge tarball for Debian unstable 
> and/or
> the world at large?  I'm CCing to the the submitter and bug report of a
> recent BTS request for a fresher octave-forge.
>
> Dirk
>
> -- 
> White House officials praised the performance of the controversial
> new Diebold electronic voting machines, which successfully tabulated
> final results from Florida before a single vote was cast.
>           -- Andy Borowitz, http://borowitzreport.com, 29 June 2004
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
> digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
> unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Oct...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
>