From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2004-06-19 16:34:05
|
<< I >> am not interested in back porting. If somebody else wants to, they can send patches to octave-dev which extends support backward. If you build with make -k, it will build what can be built and ignore the rest. Note that not all m-files have tests written for them, so changes in syntax may go unnoticed during check. We have a new issue to deal with: deal, isunix, unix and struct are now part of octave. I'm inclined to remove them from the octave-forge, which will break scripts that depend on them in older versions of octave. Someone can volunteer to create extra/shadow to support this. I would suggest configure.add script with lines such as: AC_SUBST(SHADOWED) OCTAVE_CHECK_EXIST(xxx,,[SHADOWED="$SHADOWED xxx"]) Makeconf.add with: SHADOWED=@SHADOWED@ and a Makefile which copies xxx.m.in to xxx.m if xxx is in $(SHADOWED) and removes xxx.m if it isn't. For oct-files, you need to build xxx.oct if xxx is in $(SHADOWED) or remove xxx.oct if it isn't. This way all and only the shadowed functions will be available during make check and make install. Paul Kienzle pki...@us... On Jun 19, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Chris Caudle wrote: > On Saturday 19 June 2004 01:00 am, Paul Kienzle wrote: >> I'm not interested in backporting >> support to older octave > > What is considered "officially" supported now, just 2.1.57? I > installed > Fedora Core 2 recently, which installs 2.1.50. Is that too old, or do > you > just mean the 2.0.X series? > > thanks, > Chris Caudle > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer > Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA > REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code > NWMGYKND > _______________________________________________ > Octave-dev mailing list > Oct...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev > |