From: Paul K. <pki...@us...> - 2004-06-15 21:49:03
|
Done. I'm not entirely happy with the soctcl solution because of the overhead of transferring data around, but it continues to work well enough that I don't have to fix it. Oh, well! - Paul On Jun 15, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Mark P. Esplin wrote: > Warning: tk_octave is mostly unsupported. Probably a better solution > is to > use extra/soctcl from octave-forge. > > If you decide to pursue tk_octave, please bear in mind that > the code is not safe as it is currently written. Since octave's > reference counting classes do not use semaphores, there > is a small window in which a task switch could delete > an array in octave while tcl wanted to access it. |