From: Etienne G. <et...@cs...> - 2004-01-26 13:51:18
|
Hi Michael, if the new BFGSMin does a better job, maybe it can replace the old one altogether. It would be nice to have the same calling arguments, which seems to be the case at a first glance. Cheers, Etienne PS : Maybe there's a prob w/ my tabs, but some lines appear w/ over 100 columns in emacs. On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:55:14AM +0100, Michael Creel wrote: # Hello all, # I have added some files for optimization into main/optim, in the subdirectory # "Optimize". I created a new subdirectory, since the files have some # interdependencies between themselves, and the set of necessary files wouldn't # be clear if they were put directly into optim. # # The BFGSMin.m routine, the file of central interest, is much like bfgs.m in # optim, but, in my experiece, it is more efficient and robust, since the line # search for the stepsize has been re-worked quite a bit. It has been tested # quite extensively. It also has a somewhat different interface that makes use # of cell arrays. Thus, it doesn't require "leval" and will not generate # warnings with Octave > 2.1.50. The Optimize package has no dependencies on # octave-forge - it will work with plain Octave 2.1.x. # # Any comments appreciated. Please leave the flamethrowers on low if I've make # any errors with CVS - it's the first time I attempt a commit. Michael # # # # ------------------------------------------------------- # The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 # Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration # See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. # http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn # _______________________________________________ # Octave-dev mailing list # Oct...@li... # https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.cs.uky.edu/~etienne |