Re: [OctDev] convhulln options.

[Rafael L. <rla...@us...>]

* Paul Kienzle <pki...@us...> [2003-12-10 07:20]:

> The best solution from the user's perspective is for us to keep a
> consistent interface independent of the underlying QHull version
> (as much as possible).  That way people can for example share
> scripts which use QHull without having to worry about which version
> is installed.  However, I don't know that QHull is changing enough for
> this to be a concern,

That's absolutely true.

> so for now I would go with Rafael's solution.

Okay, I feel we are reaching consensus here.  As soon as my time budget will
permit, I will implement the changes to the voronoi* and convhull* functions
in octave-forge.

-- 
Rafael