Re: [OctDev] Ocatve release 2.1.51 and Octave-Forge

[<pki...@us...>]

I've added support for TYPEID_HAS_CLASS and class names for
everything that defines a type (ov-re-tri, comm, sparse, symbolic,
dispatch). Everything compiles, and the meager tests that I have in
place run, except that sparse is broken.

Other than fixing sparse, what else do we want to go into
this release?

Oops!  It occurs to me that the current octave version should be the
unmarked form!  So instead of HAVE_ND_ARRAY it should be
MISSING_ND_ARRAY and instead of TYPEID_HAS_CLASS it
should be MISSING_TYPEID_CLASS, or whatever the GNU standard
is for negative tests.  If nothing else I should have used
HAVE_TYPEID_CLASS rather than TYPEID_HAS_CLASS.  Feel
free to fix it.

Paul Kienzle
pki...@us...

On 17 Nov 2003 at 11:29, David Bateman wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> We need a new release of Octave-Forge for 2.1.51 due to numereous changes.
> I've already made some of the necessary changes to the CVS previous for
> the fortran_indexing, etc flags. However I know of at least one other 
> change that hasn't been implemented that needs to be before a release,
> and perhaps there are other. The change I know about is that all of the
> registered types need this change made