From: Paul K. <pki...@rr...> - 2002-10-24 15:00:19
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote: > > Hello, > > I have just installed 2.1.37, but compilation of octave-forge ends > with : > > ====================================================================== > mkoctfile -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 -v fsolve.cc > g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/local/include/octave-2.1.37 -I/usr/local/include/octave-2.1.37/octave -I/usr/local/include -mieee-fp -fno-implicit-templates -g -O2 -Wall -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 fsolve.cc -o fsolve.o > fsolve.cc: In function `class octave_value_list Ffsolve(const octave_value_list &, int)': > fsolve.cc:211: no matching function for call to `NLEqn::set_options (NLEqn_options &)' > make[1]: *** [fsolve.oct] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cdisk/etienne/prog/octave/octave-forge/octave-forge/FIXES' > make: *** [FIXES/] Error 2 > ====================================================================== > > I would like to check whether the backward compatibility problem > with is_XXX() still exists, and if it does, transform all relevant > sourceforge files. > > Since this is a big step, I guess the procedure is transform, test > and send a patch for people to check, and then commit? I say commit directly. If anything really serious goes wrong we can always back out. Are we abandoning support for 2.1.36? - Paul |