From: Etienne G. <et...@is...> - 2002-09-11 17:49:09
|
Hello On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:21:04PM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote: # Some questions: # # 1) What does the vrml interface require that is not needed by other 3D # visualization functions? Is it possible that you would want something like Needed externally : FreeWRL. Internally, lots of vrml-generating functions, since what is displayed is an assemblage of shapes described in vrml. Also, some functions to speak to freewrl are needed. # the plplot setup, where you are replacing the graph viewer but using the # usual interface to manipulate it? Here, your interaction with the browser through the octave command line is minimal. You tell it 'Start!', 'Stop!', 'Display this, please' and eventually ask it what objects the user clicked upon. For changing the viewpoint and doing snapshots or films, you use the browser's interface. # 2) How does the interface compare to the matlab VR toolkit? Is there any Less fancy and free. # point to trying to match their interface? I am not trying to match it. I don't know it but for a short interaction a few years ago. # 3) Are there alternative VR's to VRML? ^ What's? Cheers, Etienne -- Etienne Grossmann ------ http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~etienne |