From: Rafael L. <lab...@mp...> - 2002-03-19 20:03:39
|
* Paul Kienzle <pki...@ja...> [2002-03-19 12:25]: > For the documentation we distribute we need to use a format that is > available to the user. html and pdf are obvious candidates here, and I see > that most everyone will be able to view MathML with a bit of effort > (http://www.w3.org/Math/implementations.html). Initially I'll use html > because it is easiest, but MathML seems like the direction we should go. DocBook may be a better choice than HTML for documentation. Indeed, DocBook is intended for writing software documentation, having tags like <funcdef>, <parameter>, <variablelist>, etc. See the Element Reference chapter of the DocBook Book at http://www.docbook.org. As an example of what DocBook can do, lokk at the documentation of the PLplot package, which has been converted (by me and others) into the DocBook format: http://plplot.sourceforge.net/resources/docbook-manual/ In particular, see the API section in http://plplot.sf.net/resources/docbook-manual/plplotdoc-html-0.4.3/api.html -- Rafael |