From: Rafael L. <lab...@mp...> - 2002-03-19 10:13:17
|
* Paul Kienzle <pki...@ja...> [2002-03-18 10:28]: > We need to settle on a document format, or maybe a small number of formats. > That way it will be easier to work together on documentation. Standard > layout of documentation in the directory would also be helpful so that the > build/install docs can work like install m-files. DocBook-XML seems to be a natural choice, besides the fact that it has no native support for mathematical typesetting. If/when MathML will work together with DocBook and have a good TeX backend, the DocBook format will be a strong candidate. Sebastian Ratz' PassiveTeX looks promising, though I never used it (see http://www.hcu.ox.ac.uk/TEI/Software/passivetex/). At any rate, editing math directly in MathML seems quite tedious and verbose. However, I think that the present discussion has to do with choice of formats and not with the actual editing. -- Rafael |