From: Matthew W. R. <ma...@ne...> - 2001-05-17 20:55:00
|
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:52:59AM +0100, Paul Kienzle wrote: > The whole project needs to be purged and a new CVS tree put in > place having the structure we want, and clear instructions on > where to put new files and directories. ... Agreed. There have been several discussions in the past on the directory structure: http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/3262/2001/2/0/ http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives/octave-dev/2000-October/thread.html http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives/octave-dev/2000-November/thread.html Personally, I would prefer to base the directories on a toolbox-type layout with each toolbox having its own directory. That way we can easily package toolboxes independently for distribution. BTW, for those that may have missed it, sourceforge has secured the sf.net domain. So an easier way to get to the home page is: http://octave.sf.net/ -- Matthew W. Roberts ------------------------------------------------------------------ Structural Engineering * Texas A&M University * ma...@ta... |