[OctDev] Re: Directory Structure

[Matthew W. R. <ma...@le...>]

A few questions on the CVS directory structure.  As I understand it,
contrib and dld at the top level are dead, right?  If so, I'll try
and get them deleted.

Also, under octave there is a contrib directory.  Originally, my
plan was to put all user-contributed scripts that are not part of
the official octave under contrib.  This does not appear to be the
case anymore.  Do we still need the contrib directory?

One more thing -- are we still planning on setting up a separate
matcompat directory?  I'd like to upload Paul Kienzle's scripts into
the repository.

Thanks, 

Matt

On Oct 29, 2000 at 10:28:21AM, Kai Habel wrote:
> Hello Etienne,
> 
> I like your classification in numeric / non-numeric but I wouldn't use
> another level for general/specific. If we have to many subdirs in the
> future we could put the most specific in a separate subdir. For the dlds
> the same structure should be used, if needed. Ok we have so far.
> 
> scripts
>    +numeric
>        +elfun
>        +....
>    +nonnumeric
>        +strings
>        +io
> 
> dld
>    +numeric
>        +elfun
>        +....
>    +nonnumeric
>        +strings
>        +io
>   
> 
> If that's ok for you, I'll start setting it up and commiting.
> 
> Bye Kai
> -- 
> Kai Habel
> mailto:kai...@gm...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Oct...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/octave-dev