From: Sergei S. <ser...@ya...> - 2012-11-01 14:26:38
|
----- Original Message ----- > From: Juan Pablo Carbajal <aju...@gm...> > To: Octave Forge <oct...@li...>; hel...@oc... > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 2:08 PM > Subject: [pkg.m] Code sprint > > Hi all, > > The code sprint to improve pkg.m will take place on the 17th and 18th > of November. > Choose your task here > http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m > > If you still want to join us you can add yourself here or just pop in > in the IRC channel those days. > http://doodle.com/x3bh7ity5knekda8 > > See you space coder ... > _______________________________________________ > Help-octave mailing list > Hel...@oc... > https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave > To write code _not_ having a spec is kindergarten nonsense. As I wrote many times, intents (if I understand them correctly) of 'pkg.m' can _not_ be implemented unless the issue of namespaces is resolved. I even offered my help: I architect the "thing" (packaging) and you guys implement it per my spec (which we first discuss). There _must_ be an architect - somebody, anybody, not at all necessarily me. Regards, Sergei. |