From: JuanPi <aj...@gm...> - 2012-10-03 21:08:32
|
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Sergei Steshenko <ser...@ya...> wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: JuanPi <aj...@gm...> >> To: Octave Forge <oct...@li...>; hel...@oc...; Octave Maintainers <oct...@oc...> >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:25 PM >> Subject: Code sprint: pkg.m >> >> Hi all, >> >> I created a doodle for November. The objective is to evaluate how many >> people are joining the code sprint >> (http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m) and on what days we should >> concentrate the activity. >> >> http://www.doodle.com/x3bh7ity5knekda8 >> >> Thank you for filling the poll >> >> -- >> JuanPi Carbajal >> ----- >> "It is one thing not to be able to perform a certain feat, but quite >> another to prove that it cannot be done." - Henry Ernest Dudeney >> ----- >> http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Help-octave mailing list >> Hel...@oc... >> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave >> > > Is there a _spec_ for 'pkg.m' ? I have my own version, which is still broken, but less - at least, for me. > > Looking into the code and playing with it I've come to the conclusion that _conceptually_ package management in Octave is not well defined, that's why I'm asking: is there a _functional_ spec telling what 'pkg.m' has to do ? > > ... > > Looking at http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m : > > "Remove -global and -local flags > * Those flags are currently ignored internally anyways so they should disappear " > > - huh ? > > They are not ignored, and packages are installed into different locations. > > Thanks, > Sergei. > Sergei, I do not know of functional specification for pkg.m. Maybe you can contribute with one or maybe you can join us! I amended the wiki. -- JuanPi Carbajal ----- "It is one thing not to be able to perform a certain feat, but quite another to prove that it cannot be done." - Henry Ernest Dudeney ----- http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ |