From: Sergei S. <ser...@ya...> - 2012-10-03 20:37:30
|
----- Original Message ----- > From: JuanPi <aj...@gm...> > To: Octave Forge <oct...@li...>; hel...@oc...; Octave Maintainers <oct...@oc...> > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:25 PM > Subject: Code sprint: pkg.m > > Hi all, > > I created a doodle for November. The objective is to evaluate how many > people are joining the code sprint > (http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m) and on what days we should > concentrate the activity. > > http://www.doodle.com/x3bh7ity5knekda8 > > Thank you for filling the poll > > -- > JuanPi Carbajal > ----- > "It is one thing not to be able to perform a certain feat, but quite > another to prove that it cannot be done." - Henry Ernest Dudeney > ----- > http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ > _______________________________________________ > Help-octave mailing list > Hel...@oc... > https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave > Is there a _spec_ for 'pkg.m' ? I have my own version, which is still broken, but less - at least, for me. Looking into the code and playing with it I've come to the conclusion that _conceptually_ package management in Octave is not well defined, that's why I'm asking: is there a _functional_ spec telling what 'pkg.m' has to do ? ... Looking at http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m : "Remove -global and -local flags * Those flags are currently ignored internally anyways so they should disappear " - huh ? They are not ignored, and packages are installed into different locations. Thanks, Sergei. |