Re: [OctDev] Dicom package / isdicom function: Carnë, please read

[Andy B. <and...@gm...>]

On 25 September 2012 20:40, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote:
> On 25 September 2012 21:23, Andy Buckle <and...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 19 September 2012 17:26, adam aitkenhead <ada...@ho...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> I've attached an updated version of the isdicom function which can now check
>>> a list of files (in a cell array) in one go, which is much quicker than
>>> checking each file separately.  Again, no rush for releasing a new version
>>> of the toolbox - just some changes I was making for my own code anyway.
>>>
>>> Also on a different note, I've written functions which read/write the
>>> Analyze format, giving functions equivalent to Matlab's analyze75info and
>>> analyze75read.  Would you rather keep the Dicom toolbox purely for the Dicom
>>> format, or are you interested in expanding it to become a general Medical
>>> File Format toolbox?  No worries if not, just thought I'd see what you
>>> thought before I see where else they could fit into Octave-forge.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:57:29 +0100
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [OctDev] Dicom package / isdicom function
>>>> From: and...@gm...
>>>> To: ada...@ho...
>>>>
>>>> > I have access to Matlab too, and it recognises the non-standard DICOM
>>>> > file.
>>>> > (Just to note, although I have tested the ML behaviour for a some test
>>>> > files, I didn't use Matlab as a basis for the code.)
>>>>
>>>> Excellent. That is the way to do it. We are careful about copyright.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>
>> Carnë - can Adam get write permission for the svn repo? He has work to
>> do (see below ;)
>>
>> Adam - do you have a sf.net account? Could you get a checkout and commit a fix?
>>
>> I have committed isdicom.m. I added a couple of tests.
>
> You didn't. Your last commit only changes makefile
>
> Carnë

oops ... svn add ... tries again

Thanks Carnë
-- 
/* andy buckle */