From: c. <car...@gm...> - 2012-09-24 08:53:23
|
On 24 Sep 2012, at 10:44, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, c. <car...@gm...> wrote: >> >> On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >> >>> Which if itself is not a bad idea! releasePKG is working fine, we can >>> make a script to generate the html of all packages. >> >> No, we do not want that. that's like the old monolithic build process, >> sounded like a good idea in the beginning, proved to be __BAD__™ in the end. >> Been there already, we don't want to go there again. >> >> c. >> > > I mean it as a one-shot thing, not as a standard procedure. > > Also, detecting where are the hardlinks (and getting rid of them when > possible) is also good. However it can create insurmountable delays. as a one-timer it's of course OK, but I do expect lots of problems. c. |