From: c. <car...@gm...> - 2012-09-07 16:03:06
|
On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:18, Claudio Freire wrote: > I thought of that, but that would be similar to > > return octave_value_list(); > > Whereas in MPI_Probe.cc:105, theres another print_usage that returns > octave_value(-1). > > I thought it should return the same thing in both cases where it > prints usage information. returning an empty octave_value_list is the standard behaviour for other Octave functions, I left the -1 return value elswhere as it was there already, but probably that should be changed too. > > Anyway, I'm sure it builds with the patch you committed, I'll confirm > a little bit later. thanks! c. |