Re: [OctDev] Wrong permissions in secs1d tarball

[c. <car...@gm...>]

On 3 Sep 2012, at 20:04, Thomas Weber wrote:

> Okay, it seems that I indeed don't understand something here. I thought
> that Rafael just meant the executable bit. Rafael, what are the
> permissions you are talking about? Apart from the executable bit, the
> permissions in the tarball are 644 after unpacking, which seems
> appropriate.

In my local copy some of the files listed by Raphael had mode 640, 
is this not the case in the tarball?

> 	Thomas
c.