Re: [OctDev] instrument-control package

[Juan P. C. <car...@if...>]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Andrius Sutas <and...@gm...> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> from now on "serial" and "i2c" packages are merged to a single package
> called "instrument-control".
>
> Function calls remain exactly the same.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Oct...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
>

Thank you Andrius!

I see you have improved the documentation of many functions. Good job!

Also I noted you are suing the "autoload" function in the PKG_ADD
script. This sounds like a good idea (but not sure if it really is,
definitely is cleaner than what we are doing in geometry and many
other), but there is no PKG_DEL and consequently when running
> pkg unload instrument-control
All the functions are still in the search path.

I see no "inverse" to autoload, so you can proceed as we are doing in
the PKG_* scripts in geometry, mechanics, ocs or any other
(multi-)package. Does anybody knows an inverse to "autoload"?

Thanks and keep the good work.


-- 
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/