From: JuanPi <aj...@gm...> - 2012-08-20 18:32:22
|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Carnë Draug <car...@gm...> wrote: > On 20 August 2012 16:23, John W. Eaton <jw...@oc...> wrote: >> On 20-Aug-2012, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> >> | On 20 August 2012 01:18, c. <car...@gm...> wrote: >> | > What about following Matlab's naming conventions and using "toolbox" or "toolchest"? >> | >> | Might as well. People keep referring to OF packages as "toolboxes". >> | Alois for example uses this term exclusively to refer to the NaN >> | package. >> >> I would rather stay away from the term "toolbox" because, for example, >> "Control System Toolbox" is a registered trademark. > > What about using the, already quite standardized by other languages, > word module? > > Carnë Single, Bundle, Module sounds good to me. Though I do not see why we are running away from Forge package. Are we going to drop all the Octave Forge presence? I think it may be wise to leave the "Forge" connection somewhere, otherwise it can get quite confusing for newcomers doing search on the internet and add to the general obscurity/misunderstanding. -- JuanPi Carbajal ----- "The bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil." - Frédéric Bastiat ----- http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ |