From: Bill W. <wil...@co...> - 2005-10-03 06:11:55
|
. . . > It's more like a lazy sequence. Since it's lazy, it can be infinite if you > define a "next" function always returning an element. But it's consuming so > when enumerating "append e e" you first consume "e" and then "e" is empty, > so it's not circular. It seems very similar to Scheme streams implemented by means of "delay" and "force", yes? Thanks, -- Bill Wood |