Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Dllist

[Nicolas C. <war...@fr...>]

> Hi,
> 
> Is there a good reason (aside from implementation easiness) not to
> allow Dllist to be empty?  IMHO, empty lists are very useful and it is
> rather an hindrance that Dllists cannot be.
> 
> To have an idea of what I have in mind, see the attached interface.
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> ChriS

I can't tell exactly since I neither wrote or use Dlllist.
Could the Dlllist authors comment on this proposal ?

Nicolas