Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Extending big_int

[Richard J. <ri...@an...>]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:27:29AM +0900, Janne Hellsten wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >   val one_big_int : big_int
> >   val two_big_int : big_int
> ...
> >   val hundred_big_int : big_int
> 
> Is there some reason (other than optimization) for not using
> big_int_of_int instead?

Not really sure to be honest.

In the code I was originally writing I kept on having to define
constants I was using at the top level - to avoid having to frequently
write '(big_int_of_int 2)' all over the place.  Whether it makes a
real difference or not I don't know.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com