Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Future of ExtLib

[Richard W.M. J. <ri...@me...>]

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:38:31PM +1100, skaller wrote:
> OK, but the naming 'test999.ml' sux :)

Yup.

> Random contributions require a more consistent naming scheme.
> So how about:
>=20
> test_<author>_<module>_<name>.ml

Seems sensible.

> <author> is the authors initials eg rj, js, nc, jh.
> <module> is the Extlib module being tested, or 'multi' if more
> than one.

Should we have tests which test more than one module?

Rich.

--=20
Richard Jones.  http://www.annexia.org/  http://www.j-london.com/
>>>   http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams   <<<
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment
http://subjectlink.com/ - Lesson plans and source material for teachers