From: Brian H. <bh...@sp...> - 2004-07-23 22:25:50
|
On 24 Jul 2004, skaller wrote: > On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 06:29, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > I use this code in a program I'm writing here at work. It's licensed > > under a BSD style license, but Dustin might be willing to release > > it under the LGPL. He's been very flexible with licensing in the past, > > but you'd have to ask. > > Actually I don't believe so. If it has a BSD licence, > you can just add LGPL on as an extra constraint. > Basically if the code is BSD you can do what you want > with it as long as you don't remove the copyright notice. > Actually, I have a problem with doing this. It's perfectly legal, but that doesn't make it *right*. I've seen BSD proponents (with some justification) complain at this sort of "license theft". There are two ways I could see doing this: - Include it, but keep that particular file BSD copyright - Rewrite it so we can apply whatever license we want to it -- "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." - Gene Spafford Brian |