From: Martin J. <mar...@em...> - 2004-04-15 07:37:15
|
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > about "array_length" I'm not satisfied either with "allocated_size" nor > "array_length" since the last one is giving information on how hashtbl are > implemented, which is never a good idea in an abstract interface. Hashtbl must provide hash tables or I will not use it anymore. It has to rely on an array-like structure. So what's wrong? Martin |