From: Richard J. <ri...@an...> - 2004-03-20 10:20:29
|
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:37:14PM -0600, Brian Hurt wrote: > 1) Unicode or no unicode? It's not that converting to/from unicode into > one of the utf- formats is so hard, it's just that now a stream of > characters is a different concept than a stream of bytes, with different > filters working on different types streams. And a conversion object stuck > in between. All pipes would now be at least three objects deep > (formatter, unicode conversion, source/sink), instead of just two. UTF-8 support should be there, and should be driven from the LANG / LC_* / locale. It's a non-trivial amount of work to get this to work of course. Rich. -- Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/ Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment PTHRLIB is a library for writing small, efficient and fast servers in C. HTTP, CGI, DBI, lightweight threads: http://www.annexia.org/freeware/pthrlib/ |