From: <syl...@po...> - 2004-03-20 10:04:41
|
Hello, On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:33:07PM +0900, Yamagata Yoriyuki wrote: > Before anything, I'd like to mention the recent exchange about another > "extlib" in the caml-list and others. I'm little embarrassed in the > current situation. If I remember correctly, another "extlib" is older > than ours, so, in my opinion, we have to change the name. Whatever > reasons there are, we have to give a due credit to the previous work. > If we are going to change the nature of our library, then it is a good > opportunity to change the name. > I don't agree with your point of view. The so called "older" version of extlib is only "older" because before it was named "stew". And one day, the upstream decided to recall it extlib. I see no reason to change the name of extlib because one guy thinks it was a prettier name. It is a personnal point of view, but i keep considering that extlib is "tm" to sf library ( and not the other one ). Regard Sylvain Le Gall |