From: skaller <sk...@oz...> - 2003-10-06 03:00:56
|
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 21:34, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > programming, this limit can vary a lot. Fixing it to 80 chars is nonsense. 80 chars is in fact way too much. 65 is more reasonable. That is the amount of reasonbly sized monospaced font text that can be fitted on a book page. Code should be readable in a fairly constrained viewport. This has nothing to do with style, but with the limitations of media. I learned the hard way typesetting code for publication. Actual code often goes way over the limit. However it can be grossly inconvenient. For example I use Vim, and Vim is super brain dead with horizontal scrolling. I don't fill up the whole width of my screen with one editor window either. Don't get me wrong, I often write code that exceeds sensible line widths. But it is pain, because ALL my code is literate programmed, and when I typeset it for LaTeX, it complains bitterly every single time the right margin is breached. TeX is GOD when it comes to typesetting quality. If TeX says badness 30000 for breaching a right margin, you'd better believe it :-) |