Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] XML Light

[Blair Z. <bl...@or...>]

Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> 
> PXP is huge, complex, didn't managed to compiled it under Win32 in one day,
> but quite complete : this library is for "professionnal" XML users. Let me
> explain my thoughts... As far as I know, there is a lot of differents ways
> of using XML, and I'm pretty sure that about 85% of the usages are for
> configuration files and import/export of XML data. Theses usages needs only
> the _subset_ of all the XML specs that Xml Light will support, I have no
> ambition of rewriting a PXP, but I think it will be good for the OCaml
> community to have such a small thing available. Of course, I would like to
> be as much compliant with the spec, so please review the code once released.
> 
> So I don't think its unuseful since I already had several users enjoying the
> previous version of Xml Light which was not even supporting CDATA et PCDATA
> ! And I don't think it's threatening either since with the help of the
> community we will stick to a given subset of the specs.

What about putting an easy to use wrapper around PXP then?  How about
helping PXP run on Windows then?

I'm sure I'm talking to a programmer here who, like me, would like to
write new code rather than use existing code :)

Best,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac <bl...@or...>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/